Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:56

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Fallout Shelter has been downloaded over 230 million times in 10 years - Eurogamer
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Diddy trial day 18 recap: 2nd Combs victim concludes 'humiliating' cross-examination - ABC News
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
‘Razor Blade Throat’ Symptoms As ‘Nimbus’ COVID-19 Variant Spreads - Forbes
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is Farage right to blame the housing crisis in the UK on migration?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All you need to know about 2025 MLB Draft Combine - MLB.com
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why are daughters mean to their mothers?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.